<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Further Study on the Value of Image Optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization</link>
	<description>tips, tools &#38; techniques to build a better website for visitors and the search engines they use.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:47:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vases for centerpieces</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-80992</link>
		<dc:creator>Vases for centerpieces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-80992</guid>
		<description>I would actually think that alt+title would be better than just the alt. I was extremelly impressed with your research. I am doing a SEO experiment myself and I find this very useful.The facility just ensures the comprehensive development they are working on. Thank you for the information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would actually think that alt+title would be better than just the alt. I was extremelly impressed with your research. I am doing a SEO experiment myself and I find this very useful.The facility just ensures the comprehensive development they are working on. Thank you for the information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fast growing shrubs</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-73686</link>
		<dc:creator>Fast growing shrubs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 20:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-73686</guid>
		<description>I would actually think that alt+title would be better than just the alt. I was extremelly impressed with your research. I am doing a SEO experiment myself and I find this very useful. I did read this blog and it was very interesting. I liked the second part the most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would actually think that alt+title would be better than just the alt. I was extremelly impressed with your research. I am doing a SEO experiment myself and I find this very useful. I did read this blog and it was very interesting. I liked the second part the most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Busch gardens coupons</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-73496</link>
		<dc:creator>Busch gardens coupons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 06:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-73496</guid>
		<description>Interesting demonstration with very interesting results. I’m also surprised that alt+title did so poorly. Glad you mentioned 508 compliance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting demonstration with very interesting results. I’m also surprised that alt+title did so poorly. Glad you mentioned 508 compliance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swimming pool prices</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-73446</link>
		<dc:creator>Swimming pool prices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 08:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-73446</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this analysis because I’m student of sociological department and I need such surveys for my diploma. I think I can take this subject for the basis. Keep up your work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this analysis because I’m student of sociological department and I need such surveys for my diploma. I think I can take this subject for the basis. Keep up your work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweet 16 decorations</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-73276</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet 16 decorations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 08:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-73276</guid>
		<description>Thank you and good job. Great article! I really gotta send it to some friends from college, they would really appreciate it. This is the first time I visit your site, but I can guarantee you&#039;ll see me around. You have some valuable stuff here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you and good job. Great article! I really gotta send it to some friends from college, they would really appreciate it. This is the first time I visit your site, but I can guarantee you&#8217;ll see me around. You have some valuable stuff here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conspiracy theory</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-72611</link>
		<dc:creator>conspiracy theory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-72611</guid>
		<description>So many variables.. they make my head hurt.. :) I have been using my key words I want to rank for in the tags/titles.. and using adword$ keyword tool to find relevant &#039;long tail keywords&#039; to sprinkle through  the post/article.. I am still very new to all this is this still (or was it ever :) a good idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many variables.. they make my head hurt.. <img src='http://www.seopittfall.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I have been using my key words I want to rank for in the tags/titles.. and using adword$ keyword tool to find relevant &#8216;long tail keywords&#8217; to sprinkle through  the post/article.. I am still very new to all this is this still (or was it ever <img src='http://www.seopittfall.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  a good idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asheville Web Developer</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-72413</link>
		<dc:creator>Asheville Web Developer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-72413</guid>
		<description>Thanks again for taking your time to do this research. I am still a bit skeptical, however.  Have you considered that the order of the images on each page may have an effect on the results of your research? 
For instance, if you ordered your images &quot;Alpha&quot;, &quot;Beta&quot;, &quot;Charlie&quot;, and &quot;Delta&quot; in that order on all pages, isn&#039;t it possible that the complex SE algorithm places more importance on, perhaps, the 2nd image because of it&#039;s placement in your html, and not just because of the contents (or lack of contents) of its alt and title attributes?

Just a thought. But maybe your test could be expanded to account for this. 

Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again for taking your time to do this research. I am still a bit skeptical, however.  Have you considered that the order of the images on each page may have an effect on the results of your research?<br />
For instance, if you ordered your images &#8220;Alpha&#8221;, &#8220;Beta&#8221;, &#8220;Charlie&#8221;, and &#8220;Delta&#8221; in that order on all pages, isn&#8217;t it possible that the complex SE algorithm places more importance on, perhaps, the 2nd image because of it&#8217;s placement in your html, and not just because of the contents (or lack of contents) of its alt and title attributes?</p>
<p>Just a thought. But maybe your test could be expanded to account for this. </p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Wordpress Themes</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-72395</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Wordpress Themes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 08:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-72395</guid>
		<description>Wow the results are crazy. I honestly wouldn&#039;t have expected the title tag to have such a negative affect, even though it shouldn&#039;t be a property of an image as it should be used in links only (according to w3c standards).

Thanks for sharing these results. Now I kinda want to go through my site and make sure all my alt tags are there :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow the results are crazy. I honestly wouldn&#8217;t have expected the title tag to have such a negative affect, even though it shouldn&#8217;t be a property of an image as it should be used in links only (according to w3c standards).</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing these results. Now I kinda want to go through my site and make sure all my alt tags are there <img src='http://www.seopittfall.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branson Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-70163</link>
		<dc:creator>Branson Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-70163</guid>
		<description>Interesting.. hopefully someday Google, Bing, and Yahoo will get on the same page :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.. hopefully someday Google, Bing, and Yahoo will get on the same page <img src='http://www.seopittfall.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-70157</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-70157</guid>
		<description>Do you know, thats totally blown me away... just proving that less is sometimes more! There has always been a &#039;fuzzy cloud&#039; over the subject of the use of the alt tag on images, but the fact that adding a title tag will actually have a negative &#039;over-optimised&#039; scoring effect.

Thanks very much and I think i can safely put the subject of &#039;image optimistation&#039; to bed!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know, thats totally blown me away&#8230; just proving that less is sometimes more! There has always been a &#8216;fuzzy cloud&#8217; over the subject of the use of the alt tag on images, but the fact that adding a title tag will actually have a negative &#8216;over-optimised&#8217; scoring effect.</p>
<p>Thanks very much and I think i can safely put the subject of &#8216;image optimistation&#8217; to bed!! <img src='http://www.seopittfall.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legos on sale</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-70041</link>
		<dc:creator>Legos on sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-70041</guid>
		<description>Many of us already consider optimizing images for Web use by reducing the file sizes as much as possible without noticeable visual degradation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of us already consider optimizing images for Web use by reducing the file sizes as much as possible without noticeable visual degradation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webdesign Roosendaal</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-69395</link>
		<dc:creator>Webdesign Roosendaal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-69395</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this research? I&#039;ve always told people and colleagues to never use the title-attribute when using images. That is what the ALT-attribute is for. Using both is just completely redundant. 

Using the title-attribute for links however... now that is completely logical. The title attribute is meant to be used to elaborate further on the linked text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this research? I&#8217;ve always told people and colleagues to never use the title-attribute when using images. That is what the ALT-attribute is for. Using both is just completely redundant. </p>
<p>Using the title-attribute for links however&#8230; now that is completely logical. The title attribute is meant to be used to elaborate further on the linked text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Davies</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-69103</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-69103</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t help but wonder if your results actually reflect what&#039;s happening in Google, Yahoo and Bing. In this test, the use of both the alt and title tags in an image tag has resulted in an apparent penalty. But is it the use of both tags, or some other factor?

For example, perhaps the lack of keyword density from other sources (e.g. the page text) has pushed the second occurence of the keyword beyond some arbitrary value and triggered the penalty.

I think it would be interesting to run the test again, but this time with the following varients...

1. Lots of keyword relevant text so the alt and title tags don&#039;t stand out
2. The use of different keyword phrases in the alt and title tags (i.e. non-duplicates)

The result of such a test would either lend weight to the theory that both alt and title negatively impact on a site&#039;s ranking, or refute it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help but wonder if your results actually reflect what&#8217;s happening in Google, Yahoo and Bing. In this test, the use of both the alt and title tags in an image tag has resulted in an apparent penalty. But is it the use of both tags, or some other factor?</p>
<p>For example, perhaps the lack of keyword density from other sources (e.g. the page text) has pushed the second occurence of the keyword beyond some arbitrary value and triggered the penalty.</p>
<p>I think it would be interesting to run the test again, but this time with the following varients&#8230;</p>
<p>1. Lots of keyword relevant text so the alt and title tags don&#8217;t stand out<br />
2. The use of different keyword phrases in the alt and title tags (i.e. non-duplicates)</p>
<p>The result of such a test would either lend weight to the theory that both alt and title negatively impact on a site&#8217;s ranking, or refute it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Llamadas Internacionales</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-68835</link>
		<dc:creator>Llamadas Internacionales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-68835</guid>
		<description>I will now have to delete all my TITLE tags from images, i was using both, the title and the alt elements. Thanks for the test!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will now have to delete all my TITLE tags from images, i was using both, the title and the alt elements. Thanks for the test!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mindwork</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-65349</link>
		<dc:creator>mindwork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-65349</guid>
		<description>A very interesting study and it is very good SEO optimization may help in promoting the site. Thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very interesting study and it is very good SEO optimization may help in promoting the site. Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Charette</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-64594</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Charette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-64594</guid>
		<description>I have to say you are very brave to attempt to make sense out of the Google system.

People who actually work there certain don&#039;t have a clue. With approximately 200 elements (changing constantly) that go into evaluating a web site, the two people I know who work for Google tell me it is a waste of time for them to try to gauge what elements might be stronger or weaker one week to the next. They also discount page rank as meaningful either.  They say that at one time page rank might have had some general relationship to search results but that they are surprised that it is still be offered considering the changes that take place every day at the Google offices.

However, anyway, you are a better man than I am for trying. (Obviously)

Beth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say you are very brave to attempt to make sense out of the Google system.</p>
<p>People who actually work there certain don&#8217;t have a clue. With approximately 200 elements (changing constantly) that go into evaluating a web site, the two people I know who work for Google tell me it is a waste of time for them to try to gauge what elements might be stronger or weaker one week to the next. They also discount page rank as meaningful either.  They say that at one time page rank might have had some general relationship to search results but that they are surprised that it is still be offered considering the changes that take place every day at the Google offices.</p>
<p>However, anyway, you are a better man than I am for trying. (Obviously)</p>
<p>Beth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Job master</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-64537</link>
		<dc:creator>Job master</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 06:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-64537</guid>
		<description>Great article. Yeah i agree that image optimisation really helps your site get good SEO reputation in front of search engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. Yeah i agree that image optimisation really helps your site get good SEO reputation in front of search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jijo@ Blogging Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-59124</link>
		<dc:creator>Jijo@ Blogging Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-59124</guid>
		<description>Well Written dude..
I am going to take a Print of this article. Such a Nice detailed report which goes through every aspects of Image Optimization. I learned something extra from your article.
Thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Written dude..<br />
I am going to take a Print of this article. Such a Nice detailed report which goes through every aspects of Image Optimization. I learned something extra from your article.<br />
Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerron Mulder</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-55556</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerron Mulder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-55556</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, though I personally think that some things could have been done better. Using links in order to get the pages / images indexed isn&#039;t optimal. The links itself have a big influence on the final results. It probably is way more accurate to only use an XML sitemap in order to get the pages / images indexed. Keep on testing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, though I personally think that some things could have been done better. Using links in order to get the pages / images indexed isn&#8217;t optimal. The links itself have a big influence on the final results. It probably is way more accurate to only use an XML sitemap in order to get the pages / images indexed. Keep on testing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-53010</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-53010</guid>
		<description>Great work.Hats off to the research you have made.Many facts were completely new to me.I always preferred alt tag and realized how useful it was now.Hope Google stays with the same algorithm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work.Hats off to the research you have made.Many facts were completely new to me.I always preferred alt tag and realized how useful it was now.Hope Google stays with the same algorithm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ehsanul Karim</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-52517</link>
		<dc:creator>Ehsanul Karim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-52517</guid>
		<description>Great findings. Just hope that google does not change the search algorithm again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great findings. Just hope that google does not change the search algorithm again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryant Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-51461</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryant Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-51461</guid>
		<description>Awesome post, I actually just started using the title attribute along with the alt in some of my sites... so it&#039;s nice to some actual results from you doing exactly that.     I do believe I&#039;ll stop this practice, it probably wasn&#039;t worth the time to begin with; but to see that it could actually have a negative effect really makes up my mind.  Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome post, I actually just started using the title attribute along with the alt in some of my sites&#8230; so it&#8217;s nice to some actual results from you doing exactly that.     I do believe I&#8217;ll stop this practice, it probably wasn&#8217;t worth the time to begin with; but to see that it could actually have a negative effect really makes up my mind.  Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HB</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-51409</link>
		<dc:creator>HB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-51409</guid>
		<description>Interesting demonstration with very interesting results. I&#039;m also surprised that alt+title did so poorly. Glad you mentioned 508 compliance - do you think alt is weighed more heavily because of its usability purpose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting demonstration with very interesting results. I&#8217;m also surprised that alt+title did so poorly. Glad you mentioned 508 compliance &#8211; do you think alt is weighed more heavily because of its usability purpose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-50466</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-50466</guid>
		<description>I would actually think that alt+title would be better than just the alt. I was extremelly impressed with your research. I am doing a SEO experiment myself and I find this very useful.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brunoseo.com&quot;&gt;Bruno SEO&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would actually think that alt+title would be better than just the alt. I was extremelly impressed with your research. I am doing a SEO experiment myself and I find this very useful.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.brunoseo.com">Bruno SEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ocala Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/further-study-value-of-image-optimization/comment-page-2#comment-50380</link>
		<dc:creator>Ocala Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=854#comment-50380</guid>
		<description>I normally try to make my alt tags descriptive to the image and page using relevant keywords. You have to keep in mind to keep your alt tags short and specific. Not all that long ago alt tag stuffing with keywords was a popular way to increase rank but that soon went way of the buffalo and doing so now can get you penalized. One short keyword phrase per image should suffice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I normally try to make my alt tags descriptive to the image and page using relevant keywords. You have to keep in mind to keep your alt tags short and specific. Not all that long ago alt tag stuffing with keywords was a popular way to increase rank but that soon went way of the buffalo and doing so now can get you penalized. One short keyword phrase per image should suffice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

