<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wants You to Be Social and Share Your Stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seopittfall.com/google-wants-you-to-be-social-and-share-your-stuff/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/google-wants-you-to-be-social-and-share-your-stuff</link>
	<description>tips, tools &#38; techniques to build a better website for visitors and the search engines they use.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:12:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pittfall</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/google-wants-you-to-be-social-and-share-your-stuff/comment-page-1#comment-12746</link>
		<dc:creator>pittfall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=347#comment-12746</guid>
		<description>Joe,
Thanks for your comment. I did touch on the fact that Google already has a service for bookmarking, not a social product like shared stuff, however, my question is why they did not integrate these social aspects into an existing product. This would allow for users of the other service to share and would afford others the ability to keep their stuff to themselves. Similar to the Google Reader product where you can share what you want and highlight what you want (by adding a star) without publishing them. Just a thought...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,<br />
Thanks for your comment. I did touch on the fact that Google already has a service for bookmarking, not a social product like shared stuff, however, my question is why they did not integrate these social aspects into an existing product. This would allow for users of the other service to share and would afford others the ability to keep their stuff to themselves. Similar to the Google Reader product where you can share what you want and highlight what you want (by adding a star) without publishing them. Just a thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Chiappetta</title>
		<link>http://www.seopittfall.com/google-wants-you-to-be-social-and-share-your-stuff/comment-page-1#comment-12725</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Chiappetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seopittfall.com/?p=347#comment-12725</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing this overview. I just stared using Shared Stuff and it&#039;s not bad. But I don&#039;t understand, as you alluded to, why the integration with other google stuff isn&#039;t better. Why can&#039;t they have the option to automatically import links to blogger, bookmarks, photos, YouTube and whatever other google services exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this overview. I just stared using Shared Stuff and it&#8217;s not bad. But I don&#8217;t understand, as you alluded to, why the integration with other google stuff isn&#8217;t better. Why can&#8217;t they have the option to automatically import links to blogger, bookmarks, photos, YouTube and whatever other google services exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

